An incorrectly specified spring — wrong rate, insufficient stress relief, or poor material choice — can cause premature failure in the most critical moments of operation, whether in a valve, a safety mechanism, or a precision instrument.
Springs are fundamental mechanical elements that store and release energy, maintain force, reduce shock, and maintain contact between parts. Designing springs correctly requires understanding Hooke’s law, stress analysis, material properties, and geometric constraints. This guide covers compression, extension, and torsion spring design calculations based on the Wahl method and materials data from JIS B 2704 (compression/extension) and ASTM A228 standards.
Hooke’s Law and Spring Rate
The fundamental relationship governing spring behavior is Hooke’s law:
F = k × δ
Where F = applied force (N), k = spring rate or stiffness (N/mm), and δ = deflection (mm). The spring rate k describes how much force is required per unit of deflection. A spring with k = 10 N/mm requires 10 N to compress it 1 mm, 50 N to compress it 5 mm, and so on. Within the elastic range, this relationship is linear.
The spring rate of a helical compression or extension spring is:
k = G × d4 / (8 × D3 × Na)
Where G = shear modulus of the spring material (MPa), d = wire diameter (mm), D = mean coil diameter (mm), and Na = number of active coils. For steel, G ≈ 79,000 MPa (79 GPa). This formula reveals the important design sensitivities: wire diameter has a fourth-power effect (doubling d increases k by 16×), while mean diameter has a cubic inverse effect (doubling D reduces k by 8×).
Spring Index and Wahl Correction Factor
The spring index C is the ratio of mean coil diameter to wire diameter:
C = D / d
The spring index is a critical design parameter. It affects both manufacturability and stress concentration. Practical range: C = 4 to 12 for most applications. C < 4 is very stiff and difficult to coil; C > 12 is springy and prone to tangling and buckling. The optimal range is C = 6–10 for most compression springs.
In a helical spring, the inner surface of the coil experiences higher stress than the outer surface due to the curvature effect. The Wahl correction factor KW accounts for this stress concentration:
KW = (4C − 1)/(4C − 4) + 0.615/C
For C = 6: KW = (24−1)/(24−4) + 0.615/6 = 1.15 + 0.103 = 1.253. For C = 8: KW = 1.184. For C = 10: KW = 1.145. The Wahl factor significantly increases the actual stress versus the nominal torsional stress, and must be included in any stress calculation.
Compression Spring Design
The shear stress in a helical compression spring under axial load F is:
τ = KW × 8 × F × D / (π × d3)
This stress must remain below the material’s allowable shear stress τallow. For static loading, τallow = 0.45 × Sut (ASME standard), where Sut is the ultimate tensile strength of the wire. For cyclic loading, the endurance limit in shear governs.
Key geometric parameters for compression springs:
| Parameter | Formula | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Free length | Lf = Ls + δmax + δinitial | Must allow for full working travel |
| Solid height | Ls = Nt × d | Nt = total coils including inactive end coils |
| Solid stress | τs = KW × 8 × Fs × D / (π × d³) | Fs = k × (Lf − Ls) at solid height |
| Clash allowance | δclash ≥ 10–15% of working deflection | Prevents coil clash in service |
| Slenderness ratio | Lf/D ≤ 4 (for fixed ends) | Higher ratios risk buckling |
End types for compression springs: closed-and-ground ends (most common, provides flat bearing surface, Na = Nt − 2), closed-not-ground ends (cheaper, Na = Nt − 2), open ends (Na = Nt). Ground ends improve load concentricity and are standard for precision applications.
Extension Spring Design
Extension springs operate in tension rather than compression. They typically have initial tension — a built-in preload that must be overcome before the spring begins to extend. Initial tension Ti depends on the spring index and manufacturing method; for springs with C = 6–10, initial tension stress is typically 30–50% of the wire’s torsional yield strength.
The force-deflection relationship for an extension spring is: F = Ti + k × δ, where Ti is the initial tension force. The spring rate k uses the same formula as compression springs. The critical design concern in extension springs is the stress at the hook ends, which is typically the failure initiation point. The bending stress at the hook is:
σb = Kb × 16 × F × D / (π × d3)
Where Kb = (4C1² − C1 − 1) / (4C1(C1 − 1)) is the hook stress correction factor, and C1 = 2R1/d (R1 = hook bend radius). For machine-bent hooks, R1 ≈ D/2, giving C1 = C. The hook stress is typically higher than the coil shear stress and governs fatigue life in cyclic applications. Side loading on hooks accelerates failure — always ensure axial loading through proper fixture design.
Torsion Spring Design
Torsion springs resist rotational deflection. Unlike compression and extension springs, torsion springs experience bending stress (not torsional shear stress) in their coils, because the applied torque bends the wire. The bending stress in a torsion spring coil is:
σ = Ki × 32 × M / (π × d3)
Where M = applied moment (N·mm), d = wire diameter, and Ki = (4C² − C − 1)/(4C(C−1)) is the inner surface stress correction factor for curvature effects. For C = 6: Ki ≈ 1.31.
The angular spring rate of a torsion spring is:
kT = E × d4 / (64 × D × Na) (N·mm/radian)
Where E = Young’s modulus (for steel, E = 206,000 MPa). Note that torsion springs use E (not G) because the coils are in bending. An important design consideration: when a torsion spring is wound in the closing direction (coils closing up under load), the mean diameter decreases. This must be accounted for when checking clearances on the arbor. If wound in the opening direction, the diameter increases and the spring may bind against the outer housing.
Spring Material Selection
Spring wire material selection depends on stress levels, temperature, corrosion environment, and cost. Common spring materials:
| Material | Standard | Sut typical (MPa) | Max temp (°C) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Music wire (SWP) | JIS G 3522 / ASTM A228 | 1600–2100 (d-dependent) | 120 | Best fatigue; small d only |
| Hard-drawn wire (SW) | JIS G 3521 / ASTM A227 | 1300–1800 | 120 | General purpose; lower cost |
| Oil-tempered wire (SWO) | JIS G 3560 / ASTM A229 | 1200–1600 | 180 | Moderate fatigue; general use |
| Chromium vanadium (SUP12) | JIS G 3565 / ASTM A231 | 1500–1900 | 220 | High stress; elevated temp |
| 302 Stainless (SUS304) | JIS G 4314 / ASTM A313 | 1100–1600 | 260 | Corrosion resistant; non-magnetic |
| Inconel 718 | AMS 5596 | 1700+ | 600 | High-temp/corrosive environments |
Music wire (SWP) has the highest tensile strength and best fatigue properties for a given wire diameter, making it the default choice for precision springs where d < 8 mm. For larger wire diameters or elevated temperatures, chromium-vanadium or chromium-silicon alloy steels are preferred. Stainless steel is chosen for corrosive environments (food processing, marine, chemical plants) but has approximately 30–40% lower strength than music wire of the same diameter.
Worked Example: Compression Spring for a Safety Valve
Design a compression spring for a safety valve that must open at F1 = 200 N (minimum) at L1 = 60 mm and be fully compressed to F2 = 280 N at L2 = 50 mm. OD ≤ 30 mm. Material: SWO oil-tempered wire.
Step 1 — Spring rate: k = (F2 − F1) / (L1 − L2) = (280 − 200) / (60 − 50) = 8 N/mm.
Step 2 — Free length: Lf = L1 + F1/k = 60 + 200/8 = 85 mm.
Step 3 — Trial dimensions: Try d = 4 mm, C = 7, so D = 28 mm (OD = 32 mm — too large). Try d = 3.5 mm, C = 7, D = 24.5 mm, OD = 28 mm — acceptable.
Step 4 — Active coils: k = G × d⁴/(8D³Na) → Na = 79000 × 3.5⁴/(8 × 24.5³ × 8) = 79000 × 150.06/(8 × 14,706 × 8) = 11,854,730/940,180 ≈ 12.6 coils. Use Na = 13 coils.
Step 5 — Stress check: KW for C=7: KW = (28−1)/(28−4) + 0.615/7 = 1.125 + 0.088 = 1.213. τ = 1.213 × 8 × 280 × 24.5 / (π × 3.5³) = 1.213 × 54,880 / 134.6 = 495 MPa. For SWO at d=3.5mm, Sut ≈ 1550 MPa, τallow = 0.45 × 1550 = 697.5 MPa. Safety factor = 697.5/495 = 1.41 — acceptable.
Fatigue Considerations and Shot Peening
Springs subject to cyclic loading require fatigue analysis. The modified Goodman criterion applies: σa/Se + σm/Sut ≤ 1/n, where σa is the alternating stress amplitude, σm is the mean stress, Se is the endurance limit in shear (≈ 0.45 × Sut for most spring steels per Zimmerli data), and n is the desired safety factor. Shot peening the spring surface after coiling introduces beneficial compressive residual stresses that significantly improve fatigue life — typically doubling or tripling the allowable stress amplitude. Shot-peened springs are standard practice in automotive valve springs and other high-cycle applications.
Conclusion
Spring design involves a careful balance between geometric constraints, stress levels, and material capabilities. The spring rate formula k = Gd⁴/(8D³Na) governs compression and extension springs, while torsion springs use E rather than G due to bending-dominated loading. The Wahl factor is always applied to account for curvature stress concentration. Material selection starts with music wire or oil-tempered wire for most applications, moving to alloy steels or stainless for elevated temperature or corrosion requirements. For cyclic applications, fatigue analysis with the modified Goodman criterion and specification of shot peening provide the safety margins required for long service life.
コメント